DOUBLING FARMERS' INCOME
(5)
LINKING VARIOUS ACTIVITIES:
Inter-Ministerial Committee to examine issues
relating to Doubling of Farmers’ Income (DFI) has identified the below
mentioned seven sources of income to double farmers' income by 2022. A holistic approach for linking of development
activities in sectors such as water resources, soil health, food processing,
rural development, power, information technology, environment, fertilisers, and
other sectors to agricultural development is needed to achieve the goal of DFI
but we do not witness any such sign except a few scattered efforts here and
there.
(6) POST
HARVEST INFRASTRUCTURE AND VALUE ADDITION:
Report of the
Committee on DFI expands the post-production value capture activities by going beyond
‘marketing’ and advocating ‘monetisation’.3 On the lines of the
well-known ‘marketing efficiency’, the Committee adopts ‘monetisation
efficiency’ as the right measure of value capture. Agricultural production is
not the sole output from the rural economy. Agriculture in turn, sets off other
near-farm and non-farm economic activities in the rural landscape. Agro-food
processing industries have the potential to generate significant employment in
production activities and also indirect employment through its forward and backward
linkages. These industries would help in reducing post harvest losses and wastes
as well as in using by-products more efficiently. This in turn will increase
rural income.
The overall well-being
of the rural population therefore depends on agriculture as a primary sector,
and various associated secondary and tertiary sector activities that either
support agriculture or are supported by agriculture.
As part of the DFI strategy, the farming household
should be empowered, not only to capture the maximum value from all that is
produced off the farms, but also from other near-farm economic activities. The
secondary sources of income help mitigate some of the risks associated with
agriculture and allows for shared income sources in a household.
(7) EXTENSION AND KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION:
Past
strategy for development of agricultural sector in India has primarily focused
only on raising agricultural output and raising farm productivity. The strategy proved successful as it led to
Green Revolution and not only made India a self sufficient at aggregate level
but also a net food exporter country. The new strategy focuses on farmer’s
welfare by using various measures to achieve the targeted income including
agricultural extension services.
Agricultural
extension has been understood as an important techno-social enabler that
supports farmers in their endeavours to produce more. If extension is to serve
the purpose of effecting a paradigm shift in agriculture from
production-centricity to income centricity it deserves to be redefined6.
Accordingly,
the DFI Committee redefines Agricultural Extension as follows:
“A
system of empowering farmers with information, knowledge, technology, skills,
risk and farm management practices, across agricultural sub-sectors and along
all aspects of the agricultural supply chain, so as to enable the farmers to
realise higher net income from their enterprise on a sustainable basis”
The new definition covers not only the
cropping systems, but also other sub-systems including horticulture, animal
husbandry, fisheries, etc. emphasising thereby the importance of
diversification, demand centric innovations and farming system approach.
Doubling real
income of farmers till 2022-23 over the base year of 2015-16 requires annual
growth of 10.41 per cent in farmers’ income (Chand, Ramesh 2017). This calls
for a multipronged action of all above strategies and plans in a time bound
action plan. The above set of activities
initiated by the government, symbolise the diligence and commitment to double
the farmers income in a time bound manner. A major impediment to the success of
these strategies is small farm sizes. A unique ‘Small Farmers, Large Field’ (SFLF)
model has been first successfully experimented in Vietnam. In this model
farmers physically pool their land and set up companies that operate like
private businesses. This experiment has
been successfully tested in Odisha informally which shows the way forward for
achieving economies of scale and reducing cost of cultivation inturn, resulting
in rise in income of farmers. NITI Aayog member Ramesh Chand, in a 2017 policy
paper, advocated collective action for minimising the scale disadvantages faced
by small and marginal farmers. The Farmer Producer Organisation/ Company
approach is one way to enable them to improve their bargaining power, by
pooling resources and linking them to the market.
REFERENCES
1. Gulati
Ashok and Sweta Saini (2016), From Plate to Plough, raising Farmers’ Income by
2022, March 28.
2. Mishra,
Promod K. (2019) Driving Indian Agriculture towards Farmers’ Welfare: Current
Policy Perspectives, Inaugural address delivered at the 78th Annual
Conference of ther ISAE, at Institute of Economic Growth New Delhi, Ind. Jn. of
Agri. Econ. Vol 74, No. 1 , Jan-March2019
3. Economic
Survey, GOI , 2019
4. Doubling
Farmers’ Income – Volume XIV Comprehensive Policy Recommendations, Department
of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture &
Farmers’ Welfare. Sept. 2018.
5. PM
Kisan Maan Dhan Yojana, http://vikaspedia.in/agriculture/agri-insurance/pm-kisan-maan-dhan-yojana
6. Economic
Times, The committee on Doubling Farmers’ Income, 14th August 2017
7. Doubling
Farmers’ Income – Volume XIV , p. 155
8. Chand, Ramesh (2017) Doubling Farmers’ Income:
Rational, Strategy, Prospects and Action Plan, Niti Aayog, GOI, New Delhi.
9. Samarendu
Mohanty & Sampriti Baruah,2018 Agricultural economics: How doubling of
farmers’ income is possible even with small landholdings, Indian Express,
1 Nov.
No comments:
Post a Comment