Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Gender Disparity in Education

Reasons for Gender Disparity in Education
Reasons are complex and many to list some of them:
  •  Uneducated parents
  •  Irrelevant education
  •  A need for child labour and apprenticeship with in family farms/business
  •  Direct costs of fees, books, and uniforms.
  •  General resistance to change
  •  A desire to retain a separate ethnic identity
  •  Limited employment opportunities
  •  Low economic returns to those who attended schools
  •  Lack of accessible and acceptance schools
  •  Concern for safety especially adolescent girls
  •  Girls are married away and join their husband's family
  •  More dropout due to discrimination and mistreatment
  •  Educated girls find it difficult to get match for marriage.

Friday, October 19, 2012

Meaning of Food Security



Concept of Food Security:
 World population now is about 7 billion and about 925 million people do not have enough food to eat. About Two-thirds of the world’s hungry people lives in just seven countries - China, India, Bangladesh Congo, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Pakistan. The concept of food security, as understood now, has been evolved over the last quarter century. Food security concept has been considered at a number of levels: global, regional national, state, household and individual. While the ultimate concern may be at the individual level it is important to realise that food security at the levels outside the preview of the individual and households have strong bearing at the performance at the individual level.
According to FAO (1983)  the basic concept of food security implied that “all people at all times have both physical and economic access to the basic food they need”.
The World Bank (1986) indicates that food security is “access by all people at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life. Its essential elements are the availability of food and the ability to acquire it”.
M.S Swaminathan says, “Food security implies livelihood security at the level of each household and all members within and involves ensuring both physical and economic access to balanced diet, safe drinking water, environmental sanitation, primary education and basic health care.
On the basis of the above definitions providing enough food to all population at all times in a country like India is a challenging task. Further the population in India is growing fast so the demand for food is growing every day. Besides this the improved purchasing power among poor will further enhance the demand for superior food and balanced diet. It has also been recognised that physical availability  of food grains alone will not ensure the eradication of hunger from the country. Economic access to food for all population especially the poor and the vulnerable sections will have to be ensured through appropriate income transfer to the poor. The 12th Plan approach paper says, “The challenge is how to feed India’s growing population with rising incomes, but limited land and water resources. The economy is expected to grow strongly and pressure on food demand is likely to remain strong over the 12th plan period.” In the light of these observations it is essential to grow enough food because this is the essential condition for ensuring the food security. Although the production of food grains have increased over the years but experts say it is slowing down. For any programme of food security the rate of growth of food grains must be above the rate of growth of population.

Are Poor Really Hungry in India?



What are the Facts?The Authentic Voice of the Poor
NSS 38th Round in 1983, as well as NSS 50th Round in (1993-94) and NSS 55th Round in (1999-2000) had direct questions on Hunger that allow a clear answers from the sufferers. The NSS questions on hunger were,
·         Do all members of your households get two square meal/enough food every day?
·         If not, then during which calendar months did you or other members of the household not have enough food every day? The number of months indicated by the household was recorded.
The proportion of households that were hungry during any part of the year by this definition[i] was 15.7 percent in 1983, 4.5 percent in 1993-94 and only 2 per cent in 1999-2000. In terms of individuals assuming that every person in the household was hungry, the estimate that the number of hungry people declined from 15.7 per cent of the total population (101million) in 1983 to 4.4 percent of population ( 37 million) in 1993-94 and further 2 per cent of the population (18.5) million in 1999-2000. It is useful to look at numbers in relation to poverty because logically the number of hungry people must be a fraction of the poor for any reasonable definition of poverty.
More formally the line defining the very poor or hungry must logically lie below the poverty line. Thus the hunger ratio must be lower than the poverty ratio. The ratio of very poor / hungry to the poor may decline, stay constant or rise, depending on the distribution of consumption in the lower half of the distribution.
NSS data reveal that the consumption distribution has consistently improved for the bottom 40 per cent of the population over time as can be seen in the table-3. The consumption of course has increased  of the bottom 40 percent of the population from 22 percent in 1972-73 to 24 per cent in 1999 -2000 but still people are hungry and a sizable number are poor. It is a matter of great sadness and shame for the nation. Therefore, serious efforts are needed to achieve the food security at the national level. This is also essential in the light of the facts that India is committed to achieve the target set under MGDs. The proposed Food Security Bill is a great hope in this direction. Before we discuss the provisions and implications of the Food Security Bill it will be better if we devote some time for understanding the concept of the Food Security.
Table: 3 Rural Consumption Distribution (NSS 30 Day Recall)


       Year
Cumulative percentage of Rural Population
Poverty HCR
Percentage
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cumulative Consumption Distribution
Rural
Total
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100


1972-73
3.7
8.9
15.0
22.0
30.1
38.7
49.1
60.5
74.8
100
56.5
54.9
1977-78
3.5
8.4
14.3
20.8
28.4
36.7
46.2
57.6
71.7
100
53.1
51.3
1983
3.8
9.0
15.2
22.1
30.2
39.2
49.2
60.9
75.5
100
45.6
44.7
1987-1988
4.1
9.5
15.8
22.9
30.7
39.7
49.6
61.5
74.7
100
39.1
38.6
1993-1994
4.1
9.6
16.0
23.1
31.1
40.0
50.1
61.7
75.8
100
37.3
36.2
1999-2000
4.4
10.1
16.7
24.1
32.8
41.9
52.1
63.8
77.8
100
27.1
26.2






















 Source: P.D. Joshi Changing Pattern of Consumption Expenditure in India and some selected states Sarvekshana Analytical Report No. 2 (July 1998) and NSS.


[i]This is the authentic voice of the poor in India.