Deductive v/s Inductive Method
In Economics, we often refer to the two broad methods of study as the deductive method and inductive method.
Deductive Method:
Deductive Method aims at testing theories. It works Like this – general theory - and develop hypothesis test hypothesis to verify the general theory. Thus it begins with a hypothesis. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. It is associated with quantitative research. We might begin with thinking up a theory about our topic of interest. We then narrow that down into more specific hypotheses that we can test. We narrow down even further when we collect observations to address the hypotheses. This ultimately leads us to be able to test the hypotheses with specific data -- a confirmation (or not) of our original theories. Deduction Means reasoning or inference from the general to the particular or from the universal to the individual. Deduction involves four steps: (1) Selecting the problem. (2) The formulation of assumptions on the basis of which the problem is to be explored. (3) The formulation of hypothesis through the process of logical reasoning whereby inferences are drawn. (4) Verifying the hypothesis.
Merits of Deductive Method Demerits of Deductive Method
Real Unrealistic Assumption
Simple Not Universally Applicable
Powerful Incorrect Verification
Exact Abstract Method
Indispensable Static
Method
Universal
Deductive economics starts with a set of
axioms about economies and how they work, and relies on these principles to
explain individual cases or events. Supply and demand analysis, a staple in any
introductory economics course, is an example of deductive reasoning because it
involves a set of generally accepted principles about demand and supply. To
summarize, deduction in economics starts with a generally accepted principle
and proceeds to the specific
Inductive
Method:
Induction “is the process of reasoning
from a part to the whole, from particulars to generals or from the individual
to the universal.”
Major Points:-
The problem
Data
Observation
Generalization
Inductive approach is concerned with generation of new theories. It works like this – Gather data- look and then develop theory. It is associated with qualitative research. It works the other way, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories. Informally, we sometimes call this a "bottom up" approach In inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations and measures, begin to detect patterns and regularities, formulate some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some general conclusions or theories.
Merits of Inductive Method Demerits of Inductive Method
Realistic Mis-interpretation
of Data
Future enquiry Uncertainty
Dynamic Lacks
Concreteness
Statistical Method Costly Method
Indispensable Difficult
to Prove Hypothesis
Universal Controlled
Experimentation not Possible
Inductive reasoning in economics does
the reverse of deductive reasoning; namely, it begins with an individual
problem or question and proceeds to form a general principle based on the
evidence observed in the real world of economic activity. For example, an
economist who asks if a government program of public works spending will
stimulate a region's economy will proceed to research the issue, collect and analyse
data, and based on conclusions, form a general theory about the economic impact
of fiscal policies.
These two methods of study have a very different "feel" to them
when you're conducting research. Inductive
reasoning, by its very nature, is more open-ended and exploratory,
especially at the beginning. Deductive
reasoning is more specific in nature and is concerned with testing or
confirming hypotheses. Even though a particular study may look like it's purely
deductive most economic research involves both inductive and deductive
reasoning processes at some time in the project.Subject matter of Economics:
Economics studies five major divisions-
Consumption
Production
Exchange
distribution and Public finance.
******
No comments:
Post a Comment