A number of theories have been developed by
different economists from time to time to understand the concept of Trade
cycles. Some economists emphasise non-monetary factors such as meteorological
or climatic factors, psychological factors or innovations whereas some others
emphasise the monetary factors. According to these economists Trade cycle is
purely a monetary phenomenon.
Nineteenth century, classical economists, such as
Adam Smith, Miller, and Ricardo, have linked economic activities with the Say’s
law, which states that supply creates its own demand. They believed that
stability of an economy depends on market forces. But world economies were not
stable as predicted by these classical economists and the world witnesses the
Great Depression in 1929-30. This proved the point that business conditions are
never stand still and fluctuations in the output is a part of capitalist
system.
There is a difference between economic crisis and
trade cycle. An economic crisis means a period of stress and strain when
business men find it difficult to fulfil their commitments. Crisis relates to
some individual trades or business when they find it difficult to honour their
repayment schedule. For example a bad weather may result in crop failure and
farmers may default in payment of bank loans. If accentuated it may lead to
financial crises and lead to failure of financial institutions on a large
scale. But none of these situations can be called a Trade Cycle. It is
difficult to know when and how exactly the trade cycle starts. In Trade cycles
there is a series of booms followed by a slump. Thus when fluctuations occure
in the aggregate economic activity with certain degree of regularity following
a pendulum like oscillations it may be referred as Trade or Business Cycle.
No comments:
Post a Comment