The three dimensional attack on poverty adopted by the government has not
succeeded in poverty alleviation in India Comment.
Answer:
·
Poverty alleviation has always been accepted as one of
the major objectives of planned development process in India but even after
vast spending on poverty alleviation programmes, the government has not
succeeded in poverty alleviation in India. Despite various strategies to
alleviate poverty, problems like hunger, malnourishment, illiteracy and tack of
basic amenities are prevalent in India. None of the poverty alleviation
strategies resulted in any radical change in the ownership of assets, process
of production and improvement of basic amenities to the needy.
Due to unequal distribution of assets, the
benefits from poverty alleviation programmes have not actually reached the
poor. The amount of resources allocated for the poverty alleviation programmes
is not sufficient when we take the magnitude of poverty into consideration. The
implementation of the poverty alleviation programmes is the responsibility of
government and bank officials who are ill motivated, inadequately trained,
corruption prone and vulnerable to pressure from local elites. The resources
are thus used inefficiently. Government policies have also failed to address
the various issues related to poverty due to non-participation of local level
institutions in programme implementation. It is evident that high growth alone
is not sufficient to reduce poverty without the active participation of the
people. Further, it is necessary to identify poverty stricken areas and provide
infrastructure such as schools, roads, power, telecom, IT services, training
institutions etc. Institutional weaknesses abound and implementation failure is
the biggest reasons that these programmes not succeeded. There exists a deep nexus between unemployment and
poverty. Unemployment or under employment and the casual and intermittent
nature of work in both rural and urban areas drives unemployed people who do
not have resources to make their ends meet into indebtedness and poverty. If employment
opportunities are generated, then more people will be employed leading to rise
in their income which in turn will reduce poverty. Due to unemployment, income
of the people is reduced to a large extent and they are unable to get access to
education, health facilities, proper sanitation, etc. This causes poor quality
of living and hence poor human capital and skills which in turn lead to poverty
making a vicious circle of poverty.
No comments:
Post a Comment